
Let’s ask the economists.
Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert cartoon, did. His thorough report is here. It basically says that economists who are Republicans favor John McCain’s policies, that economists who are Democrats favor Barack Obama’s policies, and that economists who call themselves independent favor Barack Obama’s policies, generally speaking. So no surprises there.
The Economist, a free market-leaning British magazine of the highest international repute, has a thorough and no-nonsense analysis of the two candidates’ economic plans in its latest edition. Now, The Economist has also interviewed all the members of the National Bureau of Economic Research (N.B.E.R.), which includes all the top economists in the U.S.
142 of them responded, with somewhat shocking results (at least for those of us who think in the University of Chicago/free market vein). The full data is available here.
First off, 46% of the top economists identified themselves as Democrats, 44% identified themselves as independent, and only 10% identified themselves as Republican. This does not mean that economists are mostly liberal: The Republican party has not been fiscally conservative for a while now, and so hardcore free marketeers would identify themselves as independent. Nevertheless, the high identification with the Democratic Party certainly is surprising.
Asked to grade the two candidates’ economic plans on a scale of 1 through 5, the economists gave John McCain’s plan a 2.1 (i.e., a D) and Barack Obama’s plan a 3.3 (i.e. a C). This isn’t sufficient from either, given the gravity of the current economic situation.
The economists further thought that addressing the housing and financial crisis was the most important thing a future president must do, and rated Obama’s plan at 3.1 and McCain’s plan at 2.0. The next important step the economists agreed on was to promote fiscal discipline, with Obama’s plan at 3.0 and McCain’s plan at 2.0. The scores were virtually the same for priorities three and four: boosting long-term economic growth (Obama 3.2, McCain 2.5) and reforming financial regulation (Obama 3.3, McCain 2.0).
The economists were then asked to rate the candidates’ tax plans according to efficiency, equity, simplicity, and to give the tax plans an overall rating. John McCain’s tax plan received a 2.8 rating over Obama’s 2.7 on the efficiency count, but Obama’s plan topped McCain’s 3.8 to 1.7 on equity, 2.6 to 2.3 on simplicity, and 3.2 to 2.2 overall.
Perhaps most strikingly, 80.7% of the economists thought Obama would pick a better economic team (to McCain’s 13.6%) and 80.1% of the economists thought Obama had a better grasp of economic policy (to McCain’s 7.8%). Moreover, the economists rated the importance of this election for future economic policy at 4.15 out of 5 — i.e. crucial.
Let’s hope some more surveys come out so we can put this one in context, but it’s certainly an occasion for conservatives with independent minds to stop and think.
The John McCain campaign explains his economic platform here.
The Barack Obama campaign explains his economic platform here.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.